WASHINGTON -- Despite deep doubts by the CIA and FBI,
the White House is now backing claims that Sept. 11
skyjacker Mohamed Atta secretly met five months
earlier with an Iraqi agent in the Czech capital, a
possible indication that President Saddam Hussein's
regime was involved in the terrorist attacks.
In an interview, a senior Bush administration official
said that available evidence of the long-disputed
meeting in Prague "holds up." The official added,
"We're going to talk more about this case."
Hard evidence that Hussein was involved in the Sept.
11 attacks would give strong ammunition to the
administration in its efforts to build domestic and
international support for a military campaign to
topple the Iraqi leader.
But the CIA and FBI concluded months ago that they had
no hard evidence to confirm Czech claims that the
Prague meeting took place.
A federal law enforcement official said Thursday,
however, that the FBI has been reviewing Atta's
possible ties to Iraq, including travel and phone
records, with "renewed vigor" in recent weeks. He said
he didn't know whether any clear connections had now
been found, but he called the case one of the "more
urgent" priorities for the bureau.
A U.S. intelligence official said Thursday that the
CIA remains "open to the possibility" of Iraqi
sponsorship of the attacks but that no hard evidence
or intelligence has emerged to prove it. "There is
nothing hard," the official said.
The White House previously has declined to publicly
back those who insist that the alleged Prague meeting
shows Iraq's hand in last fall's attacks. The
purported meeting with Atta, the apparent leader of
the hijackers, is the only allegation that has come to
light suggesting a direct tie between Hussein and
Sept. 11.
But the administration faces growing pressure to
provide a more-convincing rationale for a potential
military campaign against Iraq or a covert operation
to topple or kill Hussein.
A growing number of Democratic and Republican members
of Congress, though largely supportive of a possible
overthrow of the Iraqi leader, have begun questioning
the risks and costs of such a military effort and its
aftermath. So have key U.S. allies in Europe and the
Middle East. If the administration can build a strong
case against Iraq, analysts say, those questions and
doubts are likely to vanish.
Until now, the administration has largely argued that
military action against Iraq is justified because of
the danger that Hussein's regime is secretly building
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons that could be
used against the United States or its allies.
In the interview, the senior Bush administration
official acknowledged that the White House needs to
expand its effort to persuade its allies and the
American public that Hussein poses an immediate
danger.
"In our discussions with our friends around the world,
I cannot remember a single one who has not said, 'Of
course, the world would be better off without this man
in power.' There are those who are concerned about how
to do it, and the consequences," said the official,
who spoke on condition of anonymity.
"We would be the first to say that we need to talk
more about this," the official added. "But when the
case is clear, people will understand in even greater
detail why regime change is necessary."
The official said Hussein poses several threats to
U.S. interests. The Iraqi leader is a "tactical
threat," the U.S. official said, because his Iraqi
forces fire on U.S. and British military pilots
patrolling swaths of northern and southern Iraq under
mandates set by the United Nations.
Hussein is also "spreading terror" in the Middle East,
by methods that include offering to pay $25,000 to the
families of Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel and
the occupied territories, the official said.
"He also has links to international terrorism," the
official said. "There is growing evidence that that
includes organizations like Al Qaeda. That would be a
mortal threat to the United States."
Asked for specifics, the official cited Atta's alleged
meeting in Prague. "The evidence that was out there
holds up," the official said.
On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told
a news conference that Iraq had "a relationship" with
the Al Qaeda terrorist network, but he declined to be
more specific.
"I mean, we're not on the ground" in Iraq, he said.
"But are there Al Qaeda in Iraq? Yes. Are there Al
Qaeda in Iran? Yes. Are there Al Qaeda in the United
States? Yes."
Reports of the meeting first emerged last October when
Czech Interior Minister Stanislav Gross announced that
Atta had flown to Prague in April 2001 and met with
Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir Ani, a vice consul at the
Iraqi Embassy.
Ani, thought to be an officer in Iraq's intelligence
service, was expelled from the Czech Republic on April
22, 2001, after surveillance cameras caught him
studying the downtown building that houses America's
Radio Free Europe, which has an Iraqi-language service
that broadcasts anti-Hussein programs.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, an informant for the Czech
counterintelligence service told officials that he
recognized Atta's photo in the newspaper and that Atta
had met months earlier with Ani. Czech officials have
stood by that account.
However, no tapes or photos of the visit have
surfaced, and U.S. officials said an exhaustive review
failed to find any proof that he had traveled to
Prague in April 2001. Records indicate that he was in
Virginia Beach, Va., between April 8 and 11, 2001—when
he was reported to be in Prague—possibly casing U.S.
Navy facilities.
"We ran down literally hundreds of thousands of leads
and checked every record we could get our hands on,
from flight reservations to car rentals to bank
accounts," FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III said in
a little-noticed speech in April that publicly
outlined the extent of the investigation into Atta's
movements and its results.
In March, CIA Director George J. Tenet told a Senate
committee that it would be a mistake to dismiss
Hussein as a possible sponsor of the attacks.
Tenet said that although Hussein and Osama bin Laden
had clear religious and ideological differences, they
had "mutual antipathy" toward the U.S. and Saudi
Arabia and that "tactical cooperation between them is
possible."
But since Tenet's testimony, the CIA has found "no
known support by Saddam for Al Qaeda cells," according
to a U.S. intelligence official who spoke on condition
of anonymity.
The official said that evidence showed Atta had
"passed through" Prague in 1999 and 2000. He said it
was possible that Atta had traveled to Prague again
from the U.S. in spring 2001.
The official added that no new evidence substantiates
the Prague meeting and that the CIA had not been asked
to reevaluate the case. The official said the agency
has not found evidence to support allegations that Bin
Laden or his top lieutenants traveled to Baghdad.
President Bush has given indications all year that he
intends to oust Hussein, but critics say Bush has not
made a detailed case about the risks and costs of such
a venture. The debate continues to be shaped by news
leaks.
In Congress, hard questions have come both from
Democratic lawmakers and from such Republicans as
Sens. Charles Hagel of Nebraska, John McCain of
Arizona and Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, who is the
acting ranking minority member of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee.
The committee, chaired by Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr.
(D-Del.), opened two days of hearings Wednesday that
will continue in September and are likely to build
pressure on the White House to explain its case.
"We must estimate soberly the human and economic cost
of war plans and postwar plans," said Lugar, who is
also urging the White House to seek a congressional
vote before military action.
Norman Ornstein, an expert on Congress at the American
Enterprise Institute think tank, said that last winter
lawmakers were largely unquestioning about a possible
war, and Bush could have gotten 70% to 80%
congressional approval for military action in a vote.
"Now there's substantially more skepticism and pointed
questioning," Ornstein said.
Germany and France are urging caution in any military
effort. French President Jacques Chirac said this week
that the two European countries would back a military
effort only if it was mandated by the U.N. Security
Council.
Some analysts have predicted that the administration
would try to bolster its public case by discussing
what they believe is an Al Qaeda-Iraq link.
"I think they're going to pull all that together,"
said Gary J. Schmitt, a conservative strategist and
executive director of Project for a New American
Century, a think tank.
He said he expected the administration to argue that
Hussein should be ousted because of the alleged Al
Qaeda link as well as the threat that the regime may
pose by development of weapons of mass destruction.
Schmitt said he believed the Al Qaeda link would have
the widest appeal, but he added that he hoped the
White House does not give it more emphasis than the
latter argument, which he considered more compelling.
Times staff writer Josh Meyer in Washington
contributed to this report.